May 19, 2024

Lagos Lawyer Drags AIICO Insurance Company to Court over Breach of Contract

0

A Lagos based legal practitioner,Chief Abdullai Tony Dania has slammed N12,987,343.42 suit on AIICO Insurance company over alleged breach of contract.

According to further and better affidavit sworn to by Litigation Manager.Mr Abimbola Mayowa in the office of  Chief Abdullai Tony Dania counsel and the Plaintiff in this case.The Plaintiff entered into an insurance policy contract with AIICO in the year 2007, with policy No. 12028081.The Plaintiff kept to his side of the contract, and made financial deposits to the Insurance company  periodically though he missed some years when he was on admission at Igbobi Orthopedic Hospital after surviving a fatal motor accident. As agreed he ought to be paid the sum of N1,987,343.42  by the Defendant, on the maturity date 24th April, 2022.

He wrote a letter dated 28/03/2022 upon suspicion of fraudulent acts in their relationship either on the part of the Defendant or her Agents or intermediaries, requesting to be furnished with a full Statement of Account and a proper update on his policy no. 12028081.

The Defendant responded to the letter under reference above vide their letter dated 11/04/22 and stated that receipts of payments were wrongly posted to one of Mr. Dania Tony Abdullai’s mature policy which caused variation in the assumed calculation of the surrender benefit given on the stated policy, has been collected.

The Plaintiff replied to the letter referred vide a letter dated 26/04/22 insisting that the Defendant furnish proof/evidence of the referred wrongful posting mentioned above and to further provide full statement of Account and proper update of his policy no. 12028081 and any other policy belonging to the Plaintiff. The Defendant further responded vide a letter dated 2/05/2022 explaining that the receipts of payment referred to as wrongly posted to another policy belonging to Mr. Dania Tony Abdullai in their letter of 11/04/22 have now been posted correctly to policy no. 18028081 and further stated that policy no. 18028081 has lapsed and can no longer receive maturity benefit as it does not meet up with the basic requirement for maturity payout.

The Plaintiff replied to the letter referenced vide a letter dated 9/05/2022 urging the Defendant to allow parties to amicably close the transaction on policy number 12028081 and the Plaintiff paid off, unfailingly, before the end of May, 2022, failing which, the Plaintiff shall instruct his lawyers accordingly.

That the policy became due on the 24th day of April, 2022.However,when the Defendant refused, neglected and failed to pay the plaintiffhis premium which was calculated to be in the sum of N1,987,343.42.,

The Plaintiff wrote a complaint letter to the Honourable Commissioner of National Insurance Commission of Nigeria, reporting the refusal of the Defendant to pay him his premium. AIICO General Insurance Plc, was copied with the above mentioned complaint letter and he has not received any response from the Defendant.

The defendant has refused to pay the Plaintiff’s insurance policy entitlement, which has become due and thus breached the insurance contract between them, and has also refused to respond to his letter.

Chief Dania contended that facts of this case are not contentious, they are very clear, unambiguous and incontrovertible; it is based on a contract executed between the two parties.

Consequently,the action of the Insurance has left the Plaintiff with no other option than to resort to court to recover his money from the Defendant,as he verily believe that the Defendant has no defense/response to this action as the sum demanded is a liquidated sum, therefore the case of the Defendant shall not in any way be prejudiced, if the prayers sought herein are granted.

A declaration that it was wrong, improper and amounted to breach of contract for the defendant to have refused to pay to the Plaintiff the sum of N1,987,343.42 (One Million Nine Hundred and Eighty Seven Thousand Three Hundred and Forty Three Naira, Forty Two Kobo, only which the defendant was supposed to pay to the Plaintiff, upon the maturity of the insurance contract, with policy No: 12028081 executed by both parties herein.

An order directing the Defendant to pay the claimant, the sum of N1,987,343.42  being the amount due for, and or standing to credit of the Plaintiff from the insurance policy and contract he executed with the Defendant.

An order directing the Defendant to pay the Plaintiff the sum of

Ten Million Naira as general and exemplary damages, for the avoidable hardship extreme difficulties, psychological trauma,which the claimant, suffered as a result of the actions of the action of the defendant.

However,in a counter affidavit filed before the court,by the AIICO Insurance company,the company while denying almost all the claims of Chief Abdullai Dania,stated thus: that the Claimant took out a bi-annual endowment insurance policy in 2007 with policy number 12028081. The policy was for a period of 15 (fifteen years) and mature in April, 2022By the said policy, the Defendant was obliged to pay a premium of N581,571  bi-annually from April 2007 till April 2022, with a sum assured of N10,000,000 (Ten Million Naira) at maturity.Ok under the policy, the Claimant is at liberty to make a 25% partial withdrawal after five years, the Claimant is also at liberty to make a 25% partial withdrawal after ten years and make a full withdrawal of the sum assured  N10,000,000 fifteen years;(Ten Million Naira) plus a 3% revertionary bonus at maturity I.e. fifteen years.

The above benefits are only  available to the claimant if he services the policy as and when due i.e.the claimant must be be paying his premium of N581,571every six months.

The Claimant breached the contract between him and the Defendant when he decided to pay his premium in bits as opposed to the bi-annual payment in the contract between them; after the payment of the sum of N85,000 in January, 2008, the Claimant refused to service the policy until three years later in 2011 and after the 2011 premium payment, the Claimant refused to service the insurance policy;

Sometime in 2008, the Claimant requested for the status of his policies with the Defendant and by a letter dated July 14, 2008, the Defendant responded that the Claimant’s policy No. 12028081 was in force. However, the bi-annual premium was overdue for payment. Thereafter, the Claimant refused to service the policy until June 2011;

In 2010, the  Claimant wrote to the defendant for the withdrawal of his policies.

In 2011, the Claimant further approached the Defendant to know the state of his policy and the Defendant responded via a letter dated 12th May, 2011 where the Defendant further explained that the policy has lapsed and cannot be surrendered. The Defendant advised the Claimant to reinstate the policy by paying the outstanding premium of N4,070,997.The Claimant refused to pay the outstanding premium of N4,070,997 above but paid the sum of N353,996, N250,000 and N215,205 which were not sufficient to reinstate the lapsed policy. The Claimant, again, made a request to know the state of his policy and the Defendant responded via a letter dated 4th January, 2013 wherein the Claimant was informed that his outstanding premium was N5,826,650.51.

The assertion of the Claimant that he was involved in a fatal motor accident is an afterthought. The Claimant made the assertion for the first time in his affidavit and the Defendant was not notified of same.The Claimant is not entitled to any sum at all as the Claimant refused to pay the bi-annual premium, as agreed at the inception of the contract.

The Claimant did not keep to his side of the contract. The Claimant is in arrears of the sum of N15,813,783 in outstanding premiums, as stated in the Endowment contract;

Defendant explained the circumstances of the wrong posting to the Claimant and same had been rectified.The Claimant’s policy with the Defendant had lapsed and the Claimant is not entitled to any sum under the policy;

The Claimant wrote a Petition to the National Insurance Commission (NAICOM) against the Defendant. The Defendant has responded to the allegations of the Claimant contained therein to NAICOM and the Claimant is having a copy of the Defendant’s response.

The Claimant did not wait for the outcome of his Petition to NAICOM before approaching this Honourable Court, despite receiving the Defendant’s response.

The Claimant has not exhausted all domestic fora before approaching this Honourable Court; and there is no material before this Honourable Court warranting the grant of the prayers sought by the Claimant.

Therefore,it will be in the interest of justice if this application is refused. The  presiding Judge, Yelin Bogoro has  fixed 6th of July,2023 for judgement.

Leave a Reply